Similarly to dad9b335c694 ("netdevice: Fix promiscuity and allmulti
overflow"), we should not decrease promiscuity if it is already 0.

An example is after adding a team interface to bridge, the team interface
will enter promisc mode. Then if we add a slave to team0, the slave will
keep promisc off. If we remove team from bridge, both team0 and slave will
decrease the promiscuity, which will cause a negative overflow on the slave.
The team's issue will be fixed in a separate patch.

Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbri...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhang...@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 2b67f2aa59dd..9744e9f696ba 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -7338,22 +7338,19 @@ static int __dev_set_promiscuity(struct net_device 
*dev, int inc, bool notify)
 
        ASSERT_RTNL();
 
-       dev->flags |= IFF_PROMISC;
-       dev->promiscuity += inc;
-       if (dev->promiscuity == 0) {
-               /*
-                * Avoid overflow.
-                * If inc causes overflow, untouch promisc and return error.
-                */
-               if (inc < 0)
-                       dev->flags &= ~IFF_PROMISC;
-               else {
-                       dev->promiscuity -= inc;
-                       pr_warn("%s: promiscuity touches roof, set promiscuity 
failed. promiscuity feature of device might be broken.\n",
-                               dev->name);
-                       return -EOVERFLOW;
-               }
+       if ((inc < 0 && dev->promiscuity + inc > dev->promiscuity) ||
+           (inc > 0 && dev->promiscuity + inc < dev->promiscuity)) {
+               pr_warn("%s: increase promiscuity %u by %d failed, promiscuity 
feature of device might be broken.\n",
+                       dev->name, dev->promiscuity, inc);
+               return -EOVERFLOW;
        }
+
+       dev->promiscuity += inc;
+       if (dev->promiscuity)
+               dev->flags |= IFF_PROMISC;
+       else
+               dev->flags &= ~IFF_PROMISC;
+
        if (dev->flags != old_flags) {
                pr_info("device %s %s promiscuous mode\n",
                        dev->name,
@@ -7409,22 +7406,19 @@ static int __dev_set_allmulti(struct net_device *dev, 
int inc, bool notify)
 
        ASSERT_RTNL();
 
-       dev->flags |= IFF_ALLMULTI;
-       dev->allmulti += inc;
-       if (dev->allmulti == 0) {
-               /*
-                * Avoid overflow.
-                * If inc causes overflow, untouch allmulti and return error.
-                */
-               if (inc < 0)
-                       dev->flags &= ~IFF_ALLMULTI;
-               else {
-                       dev->allmulti -= inc;
-                       pr_warn("%s: allmulti touches roof, set allmulti 
failed. allmulti feature of device might be broken.\n",
-                               dev->name);
-                       return -EOVERFLOW;
-               }
+       if ((inc < 0 && dev->allmulti + inc > dev->allmulti) ||
+           (inc > 0 && dev->allmulti + inc < dev->allmulti)) {
+               pr_warn("%s: increase allmulti %u by %d failed, allmulti 
feature of device might be broken.\n",
+                       dev->name, dev->allmulti, inc);
+               return -EOVERFLOW;
        }
+
+       dev->allmulti += inc;
+       if (dev->allmulti)
+               dev->flags |= IFF_ALLMULTI;
+       else
+               dev->flags &= ~IFF_ALLMULTI;
+
        if (dev->flags ^ old_flags) {
                dev_change_rx_flags(dev, IFF_ALLMULTI);
                dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
-- 
2.19.2

Reply via email to