Hello, On Tue, 08 Mar 2011, ext David Woodhouse wrote:
> At this point it seems like it'll *so* much be quicker to reimplement > it, Mmm. Then good luck in re-implementing it. I'm not sarcastic here. > Which part isn't obvious? That we need ActiveSync support, to > communicate with legacy crap systems that can't talk standard protocols? Yes. It is not obvious for everyone. Unfortunately. > Or that a closed source implementation is a complete non-starter, since > it can't be debugged and well-integrated into the system? This seems to be also not obvious for everyone. > Can we focus on the bit about the DBus API first? There's no *licensing* > issue there, right? You could share that without having to consult the > lawyers? Or just implement DBus introspection in the next release... :) Unfortunately I need to consult lawyers about opensourcing anything. Even if it's "hello, world" app made by me in working hours. I'll try anyway. > I've love to be proven wrong in my assumption that Nokia will never > manage to pull their finger out and fix the MfE licensing in a > reasonable amount of time. By all means, please put me in touch with the > right people and we'll see if we can make it happen. I'll send you private mail about this. -- WBR & WBW, Vitaly Repin, Productivity, Nokia-D _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
