On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:20 PM, David Greaves <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Some may choose to be draconian fearing US litigation; others may go for a > more liberated approach to the market. > > Why is MeeGo compliance mandating the draconian and forbidding the > liberated? > > I can't emphasize this enough - where is the need to transform vendor choices into OS policies coming from ? Vendors can lock down/filter repositories all they want and that's OK, it's their product - it's their call. After all, if the vendor is (for whatever reason) against installing a certain app (or any app for that matter), it doesn't matter how big your MeeGo Compliant sticker is - you're not getting on that device. But I don't really see why that, existing, valid choice is considered as a good baseline policy *for MeeGo* as such ? Best regards, Attila
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
