Hey Benoit,

On 19.03.26 08:35, Benoit Panizzon via mailop wrote:
>> RFC 2076 - Precedence:
>> Non-standard, controversial, discouraged.
> 
> So - what is the most compatible way to go to mark a message as
> autogenerated to instruct autoresponders not to respond?


According to RFC3834:

    Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

But who cares for RFCs nowadays? AFAIK Microsoft for example uses
`X-Auto-Response-Suppress:` set to one of `All`, `OOF`, or `AutoReply`?

In general I guess auto-replies should not be sent to emails containing
these:

Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
List-Id:
Precedence: bulk
Precedence: junk
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: OOF
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: AutoReply
Return-Path: <>

Bonus points for not replying to noreply@ or do-not-reply@?

Regards,
Thomas Walter

-- 
Thomas Walter
Datenverarbeitungszentrale

FH Münster
- University of Applied Sciences -
Corrensstr. 25, Raum B 112
48149 Münster

Tel: +49 251 83 64 908
Fax: +49 251 83 64 910
www.fh-muenster.de/dvz/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to