kendalharland wrote:
> > I'm not sure if these names come from the demangler or debug info, but
> > windows has different implementations for both, so it not surprising
> > they're different. Assuming we don't care about the precise formatting of
> > the names, we could just check whether the name of the function is in the
> > string (and change the name to something more unique):
> > assertIn("my_first_step_target", step_in_targets[0]["label"])
>
> Sorry for the late follow up, I got pulled into fixing something else. I
> think this is a simple enough solution. I'll reupload and re-ping for review.
Updated in the latest commit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96687
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
