kendalharland wrote:
> I'm not sure if these names come from the demangler or debug info, but
> windows has different implementations for both, so it not surprising they're
> different. Assuming we don't care about the precise formatting of the names,
> we could just check whether the name of the function is in the string (and
> change the name to something more unique): assertIn("my_first_step_target",
> step_in_targets[0]["label"])
Sorry for the late follow up, I got pulled into fixing something else. I think
this is a simple enough solution. I'll reupload and reping for review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96687
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
