labath wrote:

I'm not sure if these names come from the demangler or debug info, but windows 
has different implementations for both, so it not surprising they're different. 
Assuming we don't care about  the precise formatting of the names, we could 
just check whether the name of the function is `in` the string (and change the 
name to something more unique): `assertIn("my_first_step_target", 
step_in_targets[0]["label"])`

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96687
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to