On 10 January 2018 at 22:51, Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com> wrote: > The right solution seems to be adding some sort of custom GNU ABI tag to the > DWARF. I know that won't help with existing binaries, but it sounds too > expensive to set the ASM name for everything. >
What makes you think it will be expensive? I don't know much about clang internals, but I think something has to provide a mangled name in any case. So, if we don't specify a mangled name, clang will have to do the mangling itself. For all I know, setting the asm attribute may actually speed things up, as clang could avoid doing some extra work. I think it would be interesting to try to measure the performance/memory footprint impact of just setting the asm attribute everywhere. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
