> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:31 PM, Nelson Elhage via Phabricator > <revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > > nelhage added a comment. > > Hey -- Is there anything I can do to move this patch forward? Would it help > to do something like only setting the attribute if the mangled name that > *would* be generated doesn't match the one from the DWARF? Any such symbol is > already broken for lldb, so such a patch feels perhaps safer and more > conservative, at the cost of a bit of added complexity.
That sounds fine from a complexity standpoint, but I worry about the performance impact of doing more work than we already do on all mangled names we look at. Jim > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D40283 > > > _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
