davide added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40283#983057, @nelhage wrote:
> I did a little bit of looking into performance implications today. It looks > like `DWARFASTParserClang::ParseTypeFromDWARF` is only called lazily as > symbols are needed, which alleviates some of my concerns, and also makes it a > bit trickier to construct a convenient benchmark. Does someone with > performance concerns have a specific usage pattern or operation or mode that > they're concerned by the performance of for me to dig into? My take is that we should consider going ahead with this. I tried and I confirm your experience (basically std::string in libstdc++ is undebbuggable). Please wait a couple of days in case somebody has comments otherwise I'd say this can go in. BTW, do you need somebody to commit this on your behalf? Thanks! - Davide https://reviews.llvm.org/D40283 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits