davide added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40283#983946, @aprantl wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40283#983908, @clayborg wrote: > > > I am fine with checking this. The only issue on my end is the extra memory > > that will be needed to store these often huge mangled names in every AST > > context for the 0.0001% of the time it is actually needed. > > > Well since this is for libstdc++ only, should we make this a > platform-specific behavior and, e.g., disable it on Darwin? Could be, but is it really worth the complexity? I'd rather defer this if we find it being a performance problem. Either way is fine to me, FWIW. https://reviews.llvm.org/D40283 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
