On 11/18/25 12:08 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 18/11/2025 10:06, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> Konrad >>> vfe170 is what we have on sdm845 >>> >>> So I'm just asking Luca to try the sdm845 method of waggling this clock >>> since what we have doesn't work. >> It's of course going to work because this way you're not calling the >> code that throws this error >> >> I was curious whether you know the actual reason why this is being >> done in some other GCC drivers >> >> Konrad > > No notion at all, perhaps as a workaround to this very problem.
I tried digging it up, but only managed to find that there is a signal between titan and gcc to request it being enabled (perhaps that's a fancy description of hwcg) Maybe +Taniya would know? (context: sm6350 gcc_camera_axi_clk stuck at 'on' when disabling) Konrad
