On 03/12/11 18:27, Cor Nouws wrote: > Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:50) > >> Yes ! we have not branched yet; master will branch at the >> feature-freeze before B1 so we have: >> >> master -------- Beta0 -------\----------- crazy stuff ... >> \ >> \----- Beta1 --- stabilisation - Beta2 >> >> etc. :- > > Correct. While explaining the whole event to someone else, suddenly it > became clear to me it might be much clearer when we have another naming > scheme: > > master ----- Alpha1 -------\----------- crazy stuff ... > \ > \----- Alpha2 --- stabilisation - Beta1 > > The great advantage of this is, that people having some expectation on > what a beta1 is, will not be disappointed. > Also, the whole schedule will not change, only the naming will be > conform what people get offered. > Will be something that marketing is going to praise us for, isn't it?
sounds most reasonable to me; i'd say that that calling some random revision on the dev branch that happens to build on all platforms a "beta0" is rather bad communication :) _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
