On 12/5/11 2:36 PM, Petr Mladek wrote: > I would prefer to keep it as is. In each case, I do not feel like > deciding about this myself.
I think that we can stick to Beta 1, although I feel that there would be less misunderstandings by using Alpha (for instance, FileHippo has distributed Beta 0 dropping the 0, and people have started exchanging the link on user groups, so I had to clarify - on the Italian news group - that this is not for the general user). If we stick to Beta 1, though, we should make it VERY clear on the accompanying message that this is a Beta intended to help developers, because advanced users can install it to test features and discover bugs. Otherwise, people - enemies - would start shouting loud that the quality is bad and LO is unusable (although there will always be these idiots, and their existence is a demonstration of the quality of the software, as they shout loud because they are impressed). -- Italo Vignoli - [email protected] mob +39.348.5653829 - VoIP [email protected] skype italovignoli - gtalk [email protected] _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
