> I think the latest Master builds before Beta has been splitted were > in an acceptable shape for a Beta.
I have just uninstalled Beta0 because I need my 3.4.4 functional. Not only because I actually use it to WORK but I also need some comparison to check for regressions... Is it reasonable to admit that the all current changes in master will be in Beta1? If so, using master~2011-12-02_22.36.35_libodev35 from Win-x86@6-fast as a replacement for Beta0 is acceptable? > Currently we have > > 43454 Break-off with message "Terminate Quick Starter" > 43455 Installer partly localized > 43461 LibO 3.5.0 Beta0 doesn't install in my Windows 2008 R2 64 bits > 43462 findAll doesn't work > 43485 FILESAVE: brings up unexpected "file has been changed" message > With Version Beta0, 43461, 43462, have not been checked concerning "real > Version", > > 43383 FILEOPEN: via Hyperlink from document does not work > also is "somehow" beta related. I can't test x64 or any problems specific to Windows versions newer than XP Pro SP3. Interestingly while unpacking the master build using msiexec /a I got the unopkg.bin error and then again during installation itself. I will add this information to the bug report. Cheers, Pedro _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
