lfs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • [lfs-dev] Two changes to consider for 8.0 Vladislav Dembskiy
• [lfs-dev] A method to build 32bits lfs on pure 64bits host xinglp
  • Re: [lfs-dev] A method to build 32bits lfs on pure 64bits host DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] A method to build 32bits lfs on pure 64bits host xinglp
  • Re: [lfs-dev] A method to build 32bits lfs on pure 64bits host Ken Moffat
• [lfs-dev] sysctl net.core.default_qdisc=fq not affect bridge interace br0 xinglp
• Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06 Pierre Labastie
  • Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06 DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06 Pierre Labastie
  • Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06 Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06 DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06 Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06 DJ Lucas
• [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing Kevin Buckley
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing Pierre Labastie
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing Kevin Buckley
• [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Pierre Labastie
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Bryan Kadzban
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Richard
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Jeremy Henty
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Pierre Lorenzon
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems thomas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems Christoph Feikes
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems A. Wan
• [lfs-dev] nosym branches DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] nosym branches Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] [blfs-dev] nosym branches akhiezer
• [lfs-dev] Typos on random versions of LFS. Richard Melville
• [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s Eric Stone
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s Eric Stone
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME???s akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME???s Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME???s Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME???s Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME???s DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s DJ Lucas
• [lfs-dev] Fwd: Your stand proposal for Linux From Scratch has been accepted MENGUAL Jean-Philippe
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Fwd: Your stand proposal for Linux From Scratch has been accepted Bruce Dubbs
• [lfs-dev] Doing without libXfont - more possible breakage Ken Moffat
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Doing without libXfont - more possible breakage Ken Moffat
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Doing without libXfont - more possible breakage Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Doing without libXfont - more possible breakage DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Doing without libXfont - more possible breakage Ken Moffat
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Doing without libXfont - more possible breakage Douglas R. Reno
• [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode Eric Stone
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode Pierre Labastie
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode DJ Lucas
• [lfs-dev] Incorrect url of util-linux xinglp
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Incorrect url of util-linux Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Incorrect url of util-linux Bruce Dubbs
• [lfs-dev] make --without-guile Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] make --without-guile Ken Moffat
  • Re: [lfs-dev] make --without-guile Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] make --without-guile Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] make --without-guile Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] make --without-guile akhiezer
• [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package Pierre Labastie
• [lfs-dev] Editors only: stable vs development Samuel Tyler
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Editors only: stable vs development Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] <SPAM>: Editors only: stable vs development Ken Moffat
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Editors only: stable vs development Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Editors only: stable vs development DJ Lucas
• [lfs-dev] s6 Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 maduinthemarauder
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 Jeremy Huntwork
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 Roger Koehler
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] s6 Jeremy Huntwork
• [lfs-dev] lfs binutils missing configure switches John Frankish
  • Re: [lfs-dev] lfs binutils missing configure switches DJ Lucas
• [lfs-dev] Unavaliable Samuel Tyler
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Unavaliable akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Unavaliable Tim Tassonis
• [lfs-dev] readline/ncurses trouble with readline 7.0 Mattias Schlenker
  • Re: [lfs-dev] readline/ncurses trouble with readline 7.0 Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] readline/ncurses trouble with readline 7.0 Daniel Schepler
  • Re: [lfs-dev] readline/ncurses trouble with readline 7.0 Mattias Schlenker
• [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: Minor issue: Reference to old GCC version in "6.10. Adjusting the Toolchain" Kevin Buckley
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: Minor issue: Reference to old GCC version in "6.10. Adjusting the Toolchain" Bruce Dubbs
• [lfs-dev] LFS-7.10: Stage 2 Binutils-2.27 error Kevin Buckley
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-7.10: Stage 2 Binutils-2.27 error Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-7.10: Stage 2 Binutils-2.27 error Kevin Buckley
• [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited Pierre Labastie
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited maduinthemarauder
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited Tim Tassonis
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited Pierre Labastie
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited John Frankish
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited DJ Lucas
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited Thierry Nuttens
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited DJ Lucas
• [lfs-dev] LFS and BLFS Version 7.10 are released Bruce Dubbs
• [lfs-dev] Initial commit of 7.10 Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Initial commit of 7.10 Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Initial commit of 7.10 Bruce Dubbs
• [lfs-dev] 7.10 test issues in jhalfs Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10 test issues in jhalfs Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10 test issues in jhalfs Pierre Labastie
• [lfs-dev] typo Julien Lepiller
  • Re: [lfs-dev] typo Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] typo Pierre Labastie
  • [lfs-dev] typo Julien Lepiller
  • Re: [lfs-dev] typo Bruce Dubbs
• [lfs-dev] Ready for 7.10? Bruce Dubbs
• [lfs-dev] gcc i386 test failures on x86_64 Ken Moffat
  • Re: [lfs-dev] gcc i386 test failures on x86_64 Douglas R. Reno
  • Re: [lfs-dev] gcc i386 test failures on x86_64 Ken Moffat
• Re: [lfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso Mattias Schlenker
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso Mattias Schlenker
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso Bruce Dubbs
• Re: [lfs-dev] [blfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso Mattias Schlenker
• [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - url broken Wayne Blaszczyk
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - url broken Pierre Labastie
• [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check Wayne Blaszczyk
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check Pierre Labastie
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check Wayne Blaszczyk
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check Wayne Blaszczyk
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check Bruce Dubbs
• [lfs-dev] LFS-7.10-rc1 is released Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-7.10-rc1 is released Anthony Jagers
  • Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-7.10-rc1 is released Bruce Dubbs
• Re: [lfs-dev] lfs-dev Digest, Vol 2681, Issue 1 Rical Jasan
• [lfs-dev] Change in lfs/blfs-fr MENGUAL Jean-Philippe
• [lfs-dev] Security Certificate for linuxfromscratch.org Rical Jasan
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Security Certificate for linuxfromscratch.org Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Security Certificate for linuxfromscratch.org Paul Menzel
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Security Certificate for linuxfromscratch.org Tim Tassonis
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Security Certificate for linuxfromscratch.org Tim Tassonis
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Security Certificate for linuxfromscratch.org Paul Menzel
• [lfs-dev] super Acmevinay Majagaonkar
• Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Bruce Dubbs
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze akhiezer
  • Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Mohammed Alkindi
• Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-6.2.0-RC-20160815 Romain GEISSLER
  • Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-6.2.0-RC-20160815 Romain GEISSLER
  • Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-6.2.0-RC-20160815 Douglas R. Reno

• Later messages