On 12 September 2016 at 14:04, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I also can't see what the "fix" was from the quoted thread but it looks >> like it is a "can be ignored" ? > > In the referenced message it looked to me like a spacing issue in the > output, but I cannot duplicate the failure. > > In any case, one test out of 1741+ should not be a worry. > > -- Bruce Bugger! I clearly missed the inference of the word "spacing" in your summary from the previous thread - it makes sense now. I will check the output. for any whitespace diiferences though. Cheers, Kevin -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
