> From: DJ Lucas <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 00:53:08 -0500 > Subject: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited > > Okay, now that 7.10 has released, time to bring this up again.
(Is it a little unseemly to jump on this again so immediately after new-releases announcement.) > This gets rid of the "seems to be moved" messages, Or fixup the dumbness of the generators of the 'seems to be moved' msgs? > as well as a most tests for arch=x86_64. Not a big deal, shurely? > The /lib64 directory remains for LSB (and other binary) > compatibility. Requires changes to a few CMake packages, as well as > CLang, otherwise, relatively easy. I still haven't tested rebuild of > ada, but did build a significant portion of BLFS (and since we are > following what is already done for CLFS Pure64), seems relatively safe. Why do you want (seemingly so much) to do such work - not least vs the above 'moved'/'tests' reasons - and to take b/lfs down that avenue. Does it make things more awkward for folks who may want to add 32-bit multilib to a 64-bit build. > > See patch to current SVN at: > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/lfs-nosymlinks.patch > rgds, akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
