> From: Pierre Labastie <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:53:24 +0200 > Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited > > On 08/09/2016 07:53, DJ Lucas wrote: > > Okay, now that 7.10 has released, time to bring this up again. This > > gets rid of the "seems to be moved" messages, as well as a most tests > > for arch=x86_64. The /lib64 directory remains for LSB (and other > > binary) compatibility. Requires changes to a few CMake packages, as > > well as CLang, otherwise, relatively easy. I still haven't tested > > rebuild of ada, but did build a significant portion of BLFS (and since > > we are following what is already done for CLFS Pure64), seems > > relatively safe. > > > > See patch to current SVN at: > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/lfs-nosymlinks.patch > > > > --DJ > > > I'd appreciate this move a lot : the sympling is a PITA when it comes to > DESTDIR install, because in this case, the symlink does not exist, and > has to be created for each installation (or some bad things happen later > when moving the DESTDIR to the system dir. >
:) . Automation/programming: fixup the real cause of the 'issue' that you seem to have there. You're going so far as to use DESTDIR; yet not aut-gen a symlnk that is required for a DESTDIR approach ... . Doesn't add up. akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
