> I don't follow why people going elsewhere is a problem. The problem is more, people are not going into the labs. If they succeed and go outside later is another thing.
> This is a place where ideas can get started, but it isn't a place where > ideas should be continued. If the lab is successful, it should move to > somewhere it will gain a community, and that isn't labs. Thats correct. if a lab becomes successful, it should do something else. But: - the entry for a lab is to strict (only experimental features, see discussion between Ross and myself) - how can a lab become successful with so much rules (no releases)? > I see it as entirely fine that labs should go quiet from time to time, and > believe the only thing we really should do in this situation perhaps is > advertise labs more widely. We should first discuss if there is still a real need of labs before putting more effort in it - my 2 cents Cheers Christian > > Regards, > Graham > -- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- http://www.grobmeier.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
