2012/12/10 Thomas Baumgart <t...@net-bembel.de>: > Hi all, > > On Sunday 09 December 2012 09:32:01 Alvaro Soliverez wrote: >> >> I don't have the final word on this, but my vote is against adding boost as >> a dependency. At least, until a real benefit for the application is shown. > > I second Alvaro's opinion on this one. I am not against Boost or any other > library per se, but we should see a clear benefit for the user (not the > developer) while adding a dependency to some other library.
Hi all, agreed. I think boost would be beneficial in many more areas of kmm than this particular one, but I also agree with you that it's not worth introducing now - when its benefits aren't that specific, while the cost is. I may get back to this topic someday :) I replaced optional with pointers in the newest revision. Please have a final check whether it's ready to be shipped. -- cheers, Łukasz _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
