BTW, when the Transaction objects are created, they are initialized, so I really don't see why boost::optional should be used here.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Alvaro Soliverez <asolive...@kde.org> wrote: > I disagree. It's not about adding a non-Qt dependency, which KMyMoney > already has a few. It's about adding a new dependency without a sound > rationale, just for a convenience class that one or another developer has > grown used to. > > I still don't see boost bringing in enough of an improvement to add a new > dependency here. > > Besides this, my experience with boost has been horrible in the past. > Removing or adding features for minor versions, API changing, no ABI > compatibility and other stuff. It's not the kind of dependency I'd like to > maintain. > > Regards, > Alvaro > > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Łukasz Maszczyński <luk...@maszczynski.net > > wrote: > >> needed for boost::optional though, and in my opinion we shouldn't get rid >> of boost just because it's n > > >
_______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
