Hi all, On Sunday 09 December 2012 09:32:01 Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
> Every dependency we bring into KMyMoney has a clear set of features and > benefits for the application (libGMP, libofx, aqbanking, etc.). In this > case, I only see a limited value for the developers. And it seems to me, > this could be done the Qt way. Maybe the other way is more clear, but the > only real benefit is readability. Perhaps maintainability, but that's > offset by adding a new dependency. > > I don't have the final word on this, but my vote is against adding boost as > a dependency. At least, until a real benefit for the application is shown. I second Alvaro's opinion on this one. I am not against Boost or any other library per se, but we should see a clear benefit for the user (not the developer) while adding a dependency to some other library. Unless we would safe hundreds of lines of code by using another lib .... -- Regards Thomas Baumgart GPG-FP: E55E D592 F45F 116B 8429 4F99 9C59 DB40 B75D D3BA ------------------------------------------------------------- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? -------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
