I disagree. It's not about adding a non-Qt dependency, which KMyMoney already has a few. It's about adding a new dependency without a sound rationale, just for a convenience class that one or another developer has grown used to.
I still don't see boost bringing in enough of an improvement to add a new dependency here. Besides this, my experience with boost has been horrible in the past. Removing or adding features for minor versions, API changing, no ABI compatibility and other stuff. It's not the kind of dependency I'd like to maintain. Regards, Alvaro On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Łukasz Maszczyński <luk...@maszczynski.net>wrote: > needed for boost::optional though, and in my opinion we shouldn't get rid > of boost just because it's n
_______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
