https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360478
--- Comment #243 from tomash...@gmail.com --- I am not sure the vector based approach would be foolproofer than what we have now. Let's take my example from above: A B 3 4 C D 7 8 9 10 E 12 13 14 G H where would you put H if the display shrinks? I definitely would not want the whole thing to just shrink so everything would be relatively in the same position but the icons would be tiny. I agree that DPI should be taken into account, but even that is not enough. For example, I either use my laptop on its own or docked into external monitor - in this setting, I still use the laptops display but the screen is much farther from my head. Thus for this scenariou, I would need to make everything on the laptop screen bigger. I do not think it reasonable to expect this would just set itself up automatically. The best we can hope for would be a system that would easily enable custom-configuration under specific circumstances. Display configuration allows this already, but just for display configuration - I would love to make my whole setup change slightly when I dock my laptop. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
