[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17796086#comment-17796086
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MNG-7595:
-------------------------------------
laeubi commented on PR #1339:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1339#issuecomment-1853488494
@cstamas sound quite handy, I wonder if an extra file is required here (its
often a bit hard to really reference "right" root as there is no official "the
location of the `.mvn` folder") alos it adds maybe more stuff to the repo and
hopefully user relocations should be rarely used!
So I would like to suggest to support (in addition to the file) support a
syntax like this:
```
-Dmaven.relocation.banfoo=org.foo:*:*>
-Dmaven.relocation.org=org.here:*:*>org.there:*:*
-Dmaven.relocation.javax=javax.inject:javax.inject:1>jakarta.inject:jakarta.inject:1.0.5
```
so basically everything starting with `-Dmaven.relocation.` followed by any
string will be merged with the content of a possible file given.
> [REGRESSION] $pom.-expressions in remote pom cause warnings
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-7595
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7595
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-2
> Reporter: Robert Scholte
> Priority: Major
>
> When depending on
> [wagon-http-1.0-beta-6|https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/wagon/wagon-http/1.0-beta-6/wagon-http-1.0-beta-6.pom]
> you'll get a warning like:
> {noformat}
> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:jar:1.0-beta-6 is
> invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available: 1 problem
> was encountered while building the effective model for
> C:\Users\rober\.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\wagon\wagon-http\1.0-beta-6\wagon-http-1.0-beta-6.pom
> [ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.groupId' for
> ${pom.groupId}:wagon-http-shared:jar with value '${pom.groupId}' does not
> match a valid coordinate id pattern. @
> org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:1.0-beta-6
> {noformat}
> Even though this is an old artifact, IMO we should not have such a warning
> for remote poms, as they cannot be changed. So the question is: do we need to
> reconsider the decision to only allow $project.-expressions for the build-pom?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
