[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17795863#comment-17795863
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MNG-7595:
-------------------------------------
cstamas opened a new pull request, #1339:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1339
With some improvements.
---
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7959
> [REGRESSION] $pom.-expressions in remote pom cause warnings
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-7595
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7595
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-2
> Reporter: Robert Scholte
> Priority: Major
>
> When depending on
> [wagon-http-1.0-beta-6|https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/wagon/wagon-http/1.0-beta-6/wagon-http-1.0-beta-6.pom]
> you'll get a warning like:
> {noformat}
> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:jar:1.0-beta-6 is
> invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available: 1 problem
> was encountered while building the effective model for
> C:\Users\rober\.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\wagon\wagon-http\1.0-beta-6\wagon-http-1.0-beta-6.pom
> [ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.groupId' for
> ${pom.groupId}:wagon-http-shared:jar with value '${pom.groupId}' does not
> match a valid coordinate id pattern. @
> org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:1.0-beta-6
> {noformat}
> Even though this is an old artifact, IMO we should not have such a warning
> for remote poms, as they cannot be changed. So the question is: do we need to
> reconsider the decision to only allow $project.-expressions for the build-pom?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
