rmuir commented on issue #15420: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15420#issuecomment-3526153114
I'm not going to debate this endlessly. The problem with this HNSW crap, I've said it from day one, is that it was written by data scientists instead of computer scientists. It sprays the OS with inefficient random accesses and thats why its many times slower than anything else in lucene. Other parts of the lucene index have supported efficient merge, including byte-copying when possible, for a long time and it scales perfectly fine. Now we have the data scientists trying to justify their crappy slow random accesses and wanting to make the rest of lucene crappy-slow; NO! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
