jpountz commented on code in PR #14412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14412#discussion_r2018865956


##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/LRUQueryCache.java:
##########
@@ -122,12 +123,30 @@ public LRUQueryCache(
       long maxRamBytesUsed,
       Predicate<LeafReaderContext> leavesToCache,
       float skipCacheFactor) {
+    this(maxSize, maxRamBytesUsed, leavesToCache, new 
AtomicReference<>(skipCacheFactor));
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Additionally, allows the ability to pass skipCacheFactor in form of 
AtomicReference where the
+   * caller can dynamically update(in a thread safe way) its value by calling 
skipCacheFactor.set()
+   * on their end.
+   */
+  public LRUQueryCache(
+      int maxSize,
+      long maxRamBytesUsed,
+      Predicate<LeafReaderContext> leavesToCache,
+      AtomicReference<Float> skipCacheFactor) {

Review Comment:
   I don't think that this is a reason for exposing it via an AtomicReference 
instead of a getter/setter. TieredMergePolicy, to give an example, is the same: 
many of its setters are not exposed on MergePolicy.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to