jpountz commented on PR #14401: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14401#issuecomment-2759494063
> This would also benefit https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14273 I don't think so, or rather taking advantage of range collection shouldn't help more than what #14273 does with `RangeDocIdStream`? For clarity, this `collectRange` method is more useful for aggregating values (facet "recorders" if I use the terminology of the new faceting framework?). Implementations would need to consult the `DocValuesSkipper` to check if it has pre-aggregated data over ranges of doc IDs that are contained in the range of doc IDs passed to `collectRange`. These sub ranges could be aggregated in constant time, without having to iterate over docs. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
