jpountz commented on code in PR #14204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14204#discussion_r1954905919


##########
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/histogram/HistogramCollector.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.lucene.facet.histogram;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import org.apache.lucene.index.DocValues;
+import org.apache.lucene.index.DocValuesSkipper;
+import org.apache.lucene.index.DocValuesType;
+import org.apache.lucene.index.FieldInfo;
+import org.apache.lucene.index.LeafReaderContext;
+import org.apache.lucene.index.NumericDocValues;
+import org.apache.lucene.index.SortedNumericDocValues;
+import org.apache.lucene.internal.hppc.LongIntHashMap;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.CollectionTerminatedException;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.Collector;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.LeafCollector;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.Scorable;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.ScoreMode;
+
+final class HistogramCollector implements Collector {

Review Comment:
   It makes some follow-ups that I had in mind a bit harder, but we could look 
into that in follow-up PRs. Otherwise this works for me.
   
   I see that you return `bucket` directly as an `ordinal`, which I'm not sure 
if that would work given that ordinals seem to be expected to be positive and 
dense. So that wouldn't work if the field has negative values, or very high 
values (e.g. a date field)?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to