jainankitk commented on PR #13599:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13599#issuecomment-2274473157

   > I think it's a little clunky for the reader at the same time (it's a bit 
strange to have to pass the same packed value point twice
   
   Thanks @gsmiller for providing this feedback. It also seemed bit odd to be 
passing same packed value point twice, but still wanted to get opinion on it. 
After removing the clunky parts, very small change remaining that probably 
makes sense. Would have liked to not make the change at 2 places, but it seems 
there is no good way.
   
   Just for context, I came across this code path while reviewing the changes 
for [ApproximateRangeQuery in 
Opensearch](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/13788). I am 
wondering if we can make some other changes in `PointRangeQuery` for not having 
to duplicate lot of code for `ApproximateRangeQuery`. For example - make the 
anonymous `ConstantScoreWeight` class in the `createWeight` method to named one 
allowing `ApproximateRangeQuery` to only override the specific methods
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to