mikemccand commented on issue #12895: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12895#issuecomment-1848575096
I have to stop working on this for today ... earliest I can look again is tomorrow AM! I'll try to mull in the background. I still can't explain why 9.9 written indices sidestep the read-time bug. We also need some certainty that this bug is not producing corrupt (somehow) 9.9.0 indices? Note that `SegmentTermsEnum` is used during indexing when merging segments ... so if the bug is truly contained to `IntersectTermsEnum`, then we are fine (that is truly only search time). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
