almogtavor commented on issue #12318: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12318#issuecomment-1585704251
@romseygeek Oh so that sounds even better than what I thought. In the case of `ByteBuffersDirectory` & MMap, I can treat the `match` operation like a total sync operation and use it in Reactor without bounding the `match` operation to its own thread pool. Similar to the way I treat Jackson's ObjectMapper's string-object operations for example. Sounds correct? And if I'd like to tread the `match` as a low IO operation - would you say it is preferable for me to use `ParallelMatcher`, or `PartitionMatcher`? In Reactor it is possible to execute the `match` operation on a "parallel scheduler", and therefore to let Reactor parallelize the operation. WDYT? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
