romseygeek commented on issue #12318: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12318#issuecomment-1568018194
Hi @almogtavor! I think you're probably best off writing your own Matcher implementation here, and possibly extending Monitor as well, given that `match` is an inherently synchronous method. The only IO operations happening here are in the internal searches, and the default implementation uses a ByteByfferDirectory in any case. There are some synchronization points in the QueryIndex for when new queries are registered with the Monitor. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
