zacharymorn commented on code in PR #12194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12194#discussion_r1130592912


##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/DocIdSetIterator.java:
##########
@@ -211,4 +216,22 @@ protected final int slowAdvance(int target) throws 
IOException {
    * may be a rough heuristic, hardcoded value, or otherwise completely 
inaccurate.
    */
   public abstract long cost();
+
+  /**
+   * Returns the next doc ID that may not be a match. Note that this API will 
essentially provide
+   * the following two guarantees:

Review Comment:
   While on this topic, I'm wondering also if we should also adjust the 
behavior of `BitSet#nextSetBit`, as it would return `NO_MORE_DOCS` when there 
are no more set bit (as opposed to max doc):
   
   
https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/96efb34d00bbdac6bdac2fd6f038e1dad1e31195/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/BitSet.java#L80-L83
   
   In contrast, Java's `BitSet#nextSetBit` would return -1 in such a scenario. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to