jpountz commented on PR #987: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987#issuecomment-1181718918
> if we only using compress method with variants ByteBuffersDataInput in LUCENE90, we can not using abstract method Compressor.compress, when we want to use other compression mode. I think that this downside is fine? We prefer codecs to evolve independently so when we start needing changes for a new codec, we prefer to fork the code so that old codecs still rely on the unchanged code (which should move to lucene/backward-codecs) while the new codecs only use the new code without carrying over legacy code. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
