[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17543911#comment-17543911
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10557:
----------------------------------------
Hi [~janhoy], thanks for your suggestion.
"Migrate no issues and start from fresh" is definitely an option, on the other
hand, many issues that are worth revisiting may remain Jira forever - I feel a
bit sorry for them. If unresolved issues are on GitHub (even just the title and
description) from the start, possible contributors will be able to
browse/search them. However, I think we can discuss it later.
> Migrate to GitHub issue from Jira?
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10557
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Tomoko Uchida
> Priority: Major
>
> A few (not the majority) Apache projects already use the GitHub issue instead
> of Jira. For example,
> Airflow: [https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues]
> BookKeeper: [https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues]
> So I think it'd be technically possible that we move to GitHub issue. I have
> little knowledge of how to proceed with it, I'd like to discuss whether we
> should migrate to it, and if so, how to smoothly handle the migration.
> The major tasks would be:
> * Get a consensus about the migration among committers
> * Enable Github issue on the lucene's repository (currently, it is disabled
> on it)
> * Build the convention or rules for issue label/milestone management
> * Choose issues that should be moved to GitHub (I think too old or obsolete
> issues can remain Jira.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
