[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17543849#comment-17543849
]
Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-10557:
--------------------------------------
Thanks for thorough research! I propose to skip bulk migration of Jira issues
and instead bulk comment on all open JIRAs, prompting the reporter or assignee
to take whatever action they see fit. Some will choose to migrate, others will
finalize the feature in JIRA, quite some will probably be closed as won't do,
and some will just remain open/stale/don't care. No history will be lost, we
can still refer and link to historic Jira issues, as long as ASF keeps Jira
alive.
> Migrate to GitHub issue from Jira?
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10557
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Tomoko Uchida
> Priority: Major
>
> A few (not the majority) Apache projects already use the GitHub issue instead
> of Jira. For example,
> Airflow: [https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues]
> BookKeeper: [https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues]
> So I think it'd be technically possible that we move to GitHub issue. I have
> little knowledge of how to proceed with it, I'd like to discuss whether we
> should migrate to it, and if so, how to smoothly handle the migration.
> The major tasks would be:
> * Get a consensus about the migration among committers
> * Enable Github issue on the lucene's repository (currently, it is disabled
> on it)
> * Build the convention or rules for issue label/milestone management
> * Choose issues that should be moved to GitHub (I think too old or obsolete
> issues can remain Jira.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
