mocobeta commented on a change in pull request #470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/470#discussion_r766338933
##########
File path: lucene/licenses/asm-analysis-7.2.jar.sha1
##########
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+b6e6abe057f23630113f4167c34bda7086691258
Review comment:
> Options 3 - fake out empty tree and tree.analysis modules, and put
them on our module path.
It seems to be easy... I'm not fully sure whether it is a sensible
workaround or not (in terms of it may go against the maintainers' decision or
intention).
Here's my poc.
https://github.com/dweiss/lucene/pull/11
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
