[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17218583#comment-17218583
 ] 

David Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-14067:
----------------------------------------

Hey [~hoss...@fucit.org], Mr [~dsmiley] suggested I reach out to you about 
renaming the StatelessScriptingUpdateProcessor over to 
ScriptingUpdateProcessor.  There is no "Stateful" one, and I think it 
obfuscates the point of htis update processor.  

Thoughts?   And if we do this, do we need to have backwards compatiblity with 
the old name?   I am going to link to a current PR Github, however if you 
prefer I can add a patch file to the ticket ;-)

> Deprecate StatelessScriptUpdateProcessor and disabled by default
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14067
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14067
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>            Assignee: David Eric Pugh
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 8.7
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We should eliminate all scripting capabilities within Solr. Let us start with 
> the StatelessScriptUpdateProcessor deprecation/removal.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to