chatman edited a comment on pull request #1684:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1684#issuecomment-686355702


   > @noblepaul & @chatman I find the tone of your latest comments offensive - 
that's no way to build a consensus. Please think twice before posting and calm 
down - if you have a different opinion about technical merits of this PR then 
I'm sure you can express it without personal attacks.
   
   I don't see how Noble's comments can construed as offensive. I may be biased 
in favour of my own comments, but I *apologise* if they were perceived as such. 
In any case, there is no personal attack anywhere.
   
   > By all means, if you disagree so strongly with the approach presented here 
then please do so - just be sure that you actually will do it instead of just 
complaining.
   
   I find choice of such words (" instead of just complaining") as 
unprofessional. This is a proposal, and comments are added to critique the 
design, not complain.
   
   On the other hand, Ilan wrote this on Slack:
   
   > If there’s consensus for Noble’s approach (or for that matter no consensus 
that goals 1-3 above are good guiding principles), I will stop work on 
SOLR-14613 and move on to other unrelated topics.
   
   Such threats of "stop work" unless one's design is agreed upon should cease, 
and constructive ways to collaborate should be explored.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to