gautamworah96 commented on a change in pull request #1733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1733#discussion_r469727743
##########
File path:
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/directory/DirectoryTaxonomyReader.java
##########
@@ -323,8 +323,10 @@ public FacetLabel getPath(int ordinal) throws IOException {
}
}
- Document doc = indexReader.document(ordinal);
- FacetLabel ret = new
FacetLabel(FacetsConfig.stringToPath(doc.get(Consts.FULL)));
+ boolean found = MultiDocValues.getBinaryValues(indexReader,
Consts.FULL).advanceExact(catIDInteger);
Review comment:
Thank you for looking at it so closely (and helping in debugging).
The new PR has the following changes:
1. Use `ordinal` instead of `catIDInteger` (IntelliJ says that boxing is
anyways not needed, perhaps we can remove?)
2. Use the correct `values` instance that has advanced to the correct `docId`
3. Use `ReaderUtil` to get to the `leaf` and then use `LeafReader` instead
of using the higher level `MultiDocValues` call
TEST:
`ant test` in the `lucene-solr/lucene/facets` directory (passes successfully)
`ant precommit`
I've not added any new tests because this PR changes a low level
implementation detail and the current tests already cover this
The next step is to run lucene benchmarks!
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
