[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17108624#comment-17108624
]
Tomas Eduardo Fernandez Lobbe commented on SOLR-13289:
------------------------------------------------------
bq. would or wouldn't a minExactHits=100 request make use of a minExactHits=1000
It wouldn't. Right now, it's just using equal. We could improve this for sure,
that said, I'm wondering how useful that would be in practice? like, people
doing the same request in the same index with different {{minExactHits}}.
While certainly could happen, I'm not sure how common that is.
bq. Is it possible to use WAND with ExternalFileField, as is?
[~greggny3], Can you elaborate on how you are using ExternalFieldField? sorting
by it? use it in a function query?
> Support for BlockMax WAND
> -------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13289
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Assignee: Tomas Eduardo Fernandez Lobbe
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-13289.patch, SOLR-13289.patch
>
> Time Spent: 4h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> LUCENE-8135 introduced BlockMax WAND as a major speed improvement. Need to
> expose this via Solr. When enabled, the numFound returned will not be exact.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
