[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17104757#comment-17104757
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-13289:
-------------------------------------
I agree with Ishan on not enabling this by default. Maybe re-propose that at a
later time for 9.0 on the dev list (not in some issue like here). I want to
see substantial time pass with this to get an impression from users and us.
I know \{{minNumFoundToBeExact}} is kinda long but it's more clear than the
counter-proposals and I don't expect people to be typing it often (thus "q" and
"fq" for example are justifiably super short).
> Support for BlockMax WAND
> -------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13289
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Assignee: Tomas Eduardo Fernandez Lobbe
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-13289.patch, SOLR-13289.patch
>
> Time Spent: 3h 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> LUCENE-8135 introduced BlockMax WAND as a major speed improvement. Need to
> expose this via Solr. When enabled, the numFound returned will not be exact.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
