[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963514#comment-16963514
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-9014:
-------------------------------------

{quote}The index.html is something that is archived in our artifacts.
{quote}
Ah, you are right that the Lucene binary release tarball actually contains the 
javadoc (like the Solr binary tarball used to earlier). For Solr we replaced 
that with a link to the online docs page long ago. But there's no ASF 
requirement to publish html javadoc or to do so on ASF servers. So if we 
continue to ship compiled javadocs in the binary tarball as today, it should be 
doable to rely on an external host for the online version and have one less 
site publishing challenge.

Would be kind of cool to setup a javadoc.apache.org service that does exactly 
what the javadoc.io service does, for all Apache projects (automatically 
pulling xxxx-javadoc.jars from maven on demand). Perhaps Max Zhu, the developer 
of javadoc.io would like to open source his code?

> Design a new solution for publishing JavaDoc
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9014
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9014
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>            Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: LUCENE-9014.patch, LUCENE-9014.patch
>
>
> Currently we check in to svn folders with hundreds of html files for JavaDoc. 
> Need a better way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to