amogh-jahagirdar commented on code in PR #6776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6776#discussion_r1100788235


##########
spark/v3.3/spark/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/source/SparkCopyOnWriteScan.java:
##########
@@ -123,8 +127,17 @@ public void filter(Filter[] filters) {
               tasks().stream()
                   .filter(file -> 
fileLocations.contains(file.file().path().toString()))
                   .collect(Collectors.toList());
+
+          LOG.info(
+              "{}/{} tasks for table {} matched runtime file filter",
+              filteredTasks.size(),
+              tasks().size(),
+              table().name());
+
           resetTasks(filteredTasks);
         }
+      } else {
+        LOG.warn("Unsupported runtime filter {}", filter);
       }

Review Comment:
   Just wondering should this really be a warn? Previously this seemed like an 
acceptable case , just wondering if it'll confuse users who look at the logs.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to