amogh-jahagirdar commented on code in PR #6776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6776#discussion_r1100788235


##########
spark/v3.3/spark/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/source/SparkCopyOnWriteScan.java:
##########
@@ -123,8 +127,17 @@ public void filter(Filter[] filters) {
               tasks().stream()
                   .filter(file -> 
fileLocations.contains(file.file().path().toString()))
                   .collect(Collectors.toList());
+
+          LOG.info(
+              "{}/{} tasks for table {} matched runtime file filter",
+              filteredTasks.size(),
+              tasks().size(),
+              table().name());
+
           resetTasks(filteredTasks);
         }
+      } else {
+        LOG.warn("Unsupported runtime filter {}", filter);
       }

Review Comment:
   Should this be a warn? Previously this seemed like an acceptable case , just 
wondering if it'll confuse users who look at the logs.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to