adityaksolves commented on PR #18517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18517#issuecomment-6217154833

   Thanks @pvary, makes sense. To confirm: when resolving, we would skip any 
historical schema that contains a field id no longer in the current schema 
whose name matches a live field in the current schema, and then keep the first 
SAME match. Does that replace the pre-ordered approach, or should we keep both? 
@mxm what do you think?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to