singhpk234 commented on code in PR #15595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15595#discussion_r2928006974
##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/rest/RESTTableScan.java:
##########
@@ -74,16 +71,15 @@ class RESTTableScan extends DataTableScan {
.build();
private final RESTClient client;
- private final Map<String, String> headers;
- private final TableOperations operations;
- private final Table table;
- private final ResourcePaths resourcePaths;
- private final TableIdentifier tableIdentifier;
- private final Set<Endpoint> supportedEndpoints;
+ private final Supplier<Map<String, String>> headers;
+ private final String planTableScanPath;
+ private final Function<String, String> planPath;
+ private final String fetchScanTasksPath;
+ private final boolean supportsAsync;
+ private final boolean supportsCancel;
+ private final boolean supportsFetchTasks;
Review Comment:
> Is it worth supporting cases where plan is implemented but not fetch
It could be possible i planned once already and the plan is cached and i can
send all-at-once it could be a use case, and i don;t need to do support
fetchTask if my planning is fast or its only supported for small tables wdyt ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
